tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1442827238174603755.post8031181906191698903..comments2023-09-11T08:30:08.843-07:00Comments on Life Training Institute Blog: Euphemism Alert: Nuclear Transfer Product [Serge]SKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01905606527143286458noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1442827238174603755.post-15917928773552211042007-08-24T13:55:00.000-07:002007-08-24T13:55:00.000-07:00I know that this is a serious subject; however I a...I know that this is a serious subject; however I am still "LOL" that I am a "copulation product." Isn't language a beautiful thing?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1442827238174603755.post-11673538973010214172007-08-16T09:03:00.000-07:002007-08-16T09:03:00.000-07:00So true, Serge. That's what I found so deceptive a...So true, Serge. That's what I found so deceptive about Missouri's Amendment Two last year. As Jill Stanek wrote...<BR/><BR/>"Crafters of the amendment knew people overwhelmingly oppose cloning. So to authorize cloning while maintaining they were not, they simply changed the definition of cloning to say a clone isn't a clone unless implanted in a mother's uterus. <BR/><BR/>This is like saying you are not you unless you are in your house. If you leave your house, you are no longer you. You are a thing. And if you are caught outside your house, you can be dissected and sold for parts. <BR/><BR/>Crafters said while they banned cloning, they endorsed "somatic cell nuclear transfer." This is like banning the killing of humans but endorsing the killing of Homo sapiens. Somatic cell nuclear transfer is cloning."<BR/><BR/>Imagine how much could be accomplished if <I>both sides</I> of this issue would stop using deceptive rhetoric and just stick with facts and sound reasoning.Josh B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/01935312402091845351noreply@blogger.com