My friend found me on campus after his
first political science class. He told me his professor began the
first day saying, “There is nothing in the world I hate more than
young, white, Republican, Christian men. If you are one of those you
are going to have a tough time this quarter.” My friend was all of
those.
Earlier in my college career I sat in a
world history class where the professor cooly explained that any
Christians in the room would learn over the course of our studies
that what they have been taught is history is in fact a lie. At the
time I was an atheist and couldn't care less if our subject matter
bothered Christians, but I remember looking over the syllabus and not
seeing anything in our class outline directly related to Christian
history or even tangentially relevant. Why was this professor
talking about that?
In a performance art class we took an
instruction period to watch a supremely intellectual show like Ricky
Lake or Phil Donahue – which talk show it was escapes me now –
where the format pitted homosexuals against ministers from black
churches that identified homosexual behavior as sin. After a
particularly bad exchange between the two parties our professor
stopped the tape and asked the class, “What do you all think about
that?” You can imagine that a performance class instructed by an
openly gay professor had some rather harsh criticism for the
Christians on the show, but they saved their most intense attacks for
the two Christian students in the class who attempted to defend the
ministers. In short time, only one was left defending the ministers
as the other crumbled under the pressure.
Those are just three stories
demonstrating the challenges that await Christians on college
campuses. Notice that you had three different subject matters with
professors all intentionally bringing their class focus to a direct
criticism of Christian beliefs. Whether it was in theater classes,
journalism classes, business and professional speaking, or world lit
every class offered challenges to the foundational beliefs that
Christians bring into the university with them. Obviously some of
the professors – like that political science teacher – were more
direct than others, but the consistent thread of college life was
challenge. This may surprise you, but I think that is to be
expected.
This is not some dire warning about
evil universities. I went into college an atheist and came out a
Christian. My friends that most enjoyed the class with the
previously mentioned political science professor were the objects of
his initial rant. When push came to shove, they enjoyed an
environment that demanded they learn to defend their views. The
professor most influential on me was as politically liberal as anyone
I met on campus. He was also a good man who cared about his
students. One very politically liberal professor I met after my
conversion helped me to reevaluate the importance of entertainment
that builds community rather than tearing it down even as she
recognized that we both had different ideas about what we would like
to build towards. If you are prepared, the challenge of college life
can give you the chance to reach out to more people than you can
imagine.
Scott and I recently worked with the
leadership of Students for Life of America. We trained and talked to
some of the brightest and most committed young people I have ever had
the pleasure of meeting. The purpose of their meeting was to equip
their leadership to not only withstand the challenge of university
life but to challenge right back as it pertains to the sanctity of
human life. They know that intelligent and committed students can
make a difference on college campuses and rather than shying away
they are preparing to engage.
We only have two options. Withdraw or
engage. Well if you have seen Battle: Los Angeles or are familiar
with the motto of the 2nd Battalion 5th Marines
then you can guess how I feel about retreating. To quote –
and look away if salty language bothers you - “Retreat? Hell we
just got here!” That quote is attributed to Marine Captain Lloyd
W. Williams when a French officer advised his battalion to pull back
at the Battle of Belleau Wood in June of 1918 in World War I. He did
not survive the battle but “Retreat Hell” permanently became the
motto of 2/5. When I meet the passionate and engaging students on
college campuses organizing events and encouraging dialogue or when I
talk to skeptical students willing to listen to reasoned argument and
reconsider their views I am inspired. We don't need to pull back we
need to train more people to engage effectively.
Besides complete retreat doesn't work.
I once heard J. P. Moreland give a presentation about when
evangelical and fundamentalist Christians pulled out of universities
to open Christian schools in response to the rapid secularization of
the major university environment. Ronald Numbers - an agnostic - similarly discusses
a retreat in his book The Creationists where he relays that after
failing to defeat Darwinism and the perceived attack it represented
on traditional Christian beliefs in the academic world:
“rather than surrendering, they
turned their energies toward developing a separate institutional base
from which to evangelize the world... despairing of ever converting
the scientific community to their way of thinking, they set about to
create their own societies and journals.” (Chapter 6)
What was the result? Well we left the
campuses entirely to those we most radically disagree with and in the
absence of challenge a worldview developed unchecked that we are only
now seeing fully expressed in our society. That is not to say that
there is not a legitimate place for Bible institutes, Christian
universities, and Christian academic journals but their must also be
a concerted effort to prepare the young men and women that are going
to public and secular universities to think critically and understand
their own worldview. Circling the wagons and disengaging not only
hurts the campuses that need well prepared Christians within their
communities but it also allows ideas that need to be shed - that would
not survive critical inspection - to be exposed. We all need that or
else we never grow.
Challenge is unavoidable. Parents tell
me their middle schoolers already have little outspoken atheist
friends. In my church, I have had more than one occasion when lay
teachers were saying something that they were completely unaware is contrary to traditional Christian doctrine. In one class at church I
had the bizarre experience of defending evolutionary theory from
straw man attacks. As the class grew ever more frustrated with me, I
insisted that nothing good could come from their preparing to engage
a view of evolutionary theory that doesn't exist or in convincing
themselves that people that believe in Darwinian evolution are
stupid. They would be sorely disappointed and embarrassed when they
met an actual defender of actual evolutionary arguments and they
realized they were not ready for this conversation. At work - both
in secular business and in ministry – my beliefs were and are
routinely challenged by coworkers. And this doesn't even get into
the daily challenge my kids put to our beliefs. Why? Why? Why? Why?
It never ends.
Since challenge cannot be skirted then
the proper response is to be ready for challenge. We must instill in
ourselves and our children the value of studying our beliefs and
being prepared to articulate those beliefs to those who question us.
As the oft quoted 1 Peter 3:15 commands: “But in your hearts revere
Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who
asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this
with gentleness and respect” To be certain, we may have to watch a
little less TV. It may require we sacrifice some of what we call
“free time” or “me time” or “down time.” It most
certainly will require that we read and interact with literature that
forces us out of our comfort zone and may put at risk cherished
personal beliefs that cannot withstand scrutiny.
I tell every group that I work with
that no one – not one single person – ever left Christianity
because it was proven false. They either left for emotional reasons
as opposed to intellectual reasons or – as Bill Craig says- because
some belief within Christianity was strongly challenged and though it
wasn't foundational to our faith it held an unnecessary level of
importance in their personal understanding of Christianity. I have
found that a proper and basic understanding of the foundations of
Christianity and the evidences and basis for those beliefs
establishes a faith that is strengthened by challenge.
In my next post I will start to talk
about some of those foundational beliefs.
Great stuff, Jay. I am preparing to teach a worldview course at my home church and I will be stealing (with proper credit, of course) some lines from this little gem.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to the rest of the series ...
Thanks, Bob! I think it is going to take more posts than I thought originally. What a shock, right? Jay is running long.
ReplyDelete