Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Pathetic Justice [Bob]

Though our new president's radical pro-abortion views are well-known, it is insightful to pay attention to those he nominates to carry out the administration's policies and the legal defense of those policies. To that end, I thought it would be interesting to note one of his nominees to the Justice Department that hasn't gotten much press in the mainstream media.

President Obama has nominated Indiana University Law professor Dawn Johnsen to head the department's Office of Legal Counsel. Among her qualifications, Johnsen is a Yale educated, ACLU trained veteran of the Clinton administration (nothing surprising so far) who also happened to work as Legal Director of NARAL. During her tenure there, Johnsen argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, a case that involved a Missouri law that restricted the use of state funds and resources for abortion (note: the law did not ban abortion), that any restriction that makes abortion less accessible is:
tantamount to "involuntary servitude" because it "requires a woman to provide continuous physical service to the fetus in order to further the state's asserted interest [in the life of the unborn] ... [a woman, therefore] is constantly aware for nine months that her body is not her own: the state has conscripted her body for its own ends ... such forced pregnancy" violates the Thirteenth Amendment. (Source: National Review, 3/9/09 p.17)
If you don't have your Constitution in front of you, you may have forgotten that the Thirteenth Amendment is the one that prohibits slavery.

But that's not all.

Along with equating pregnancy with slavery, Ms. Johnsen opposes: 24-hour waiting periods, parental consent requirements for minors, and all laws against partial birth abortion. In fact, Johnsen believes that agreeing with her on these issues should be a litmus test for judicial nominees because "the notion that legal restrictions [are] some kind of 'reasonable compromise' -- perhaps to make abortion 'safe, legal, and rare,' prove nonsensical."

Is this the Obama adminstration's version of moral neutrality in the law?


  1. Brilliant, Bob! Great post. However, you are now a right wing extremist terrorist. I know: Obama's Justice Department just said so. Here is the list of those they're including in that label:

    "It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

    Watch your butt, my friend. But don't you dare think of surrending that acid pen of yours. Great stuff!

  2. Uh oh. I guess I need to peel those bumper stickers off my car too -- especially the one on my son's car that says "Pirates for Hire" :-) He's had it for 6 years but it just became relevant!


All comments are moderated. We reject all comments containing obscenity. We reserve the right to reject any and all comments that are considered inappropriate or off-topic without explanation.